Second Opinions
What a Florida Parenting Plan Review Should Cover Before You Sign
What a thorough independent review of a proposed Florida parenting plan should examine before the court enters it.
Last updated · Reviewed by Aliette Hernandez Carolan, Esq.
The resources in this library are for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Aliette Hernandez Carolan, Esq. is licensed to practice law in Florida only.
A parenting plan is the most durable document that comes out of a Florida divorce or paternity case. A final judgment can be modified. A marital settlement agreement on financial issues, once entered, is difficult but not impossible to revisit. A parenting plan, once ratified by the court, can only be changed upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances that was not anticipated at the time the plan was entered. That is a high threshold. It is designed to provide stability for children. It also means that the mistakes made in a parenting plan are the mistakes you live with the longest.
Most parenting plans are reviewed for the big things: time-sharing percentages, holiday schedules, school decisions. The provisions that produce the most post-judgment litigation are not the big things. They are the specific, operational details that seemed too granular to negotiate carefully at the time and turned out to matter enormously in practice.
This article covers what a thorough independent review of a proposed Florida parenting plan should examine before you sign.
The Baseline Review: What the Plan Must Contain
Florida Statute Section 61.13 requires that every parenting plan address three categories: the time-sharing schedule, the allocation of daily parenting responsibilities, and the designation of parental responsibility for major decisions including health care, education, and extracurricular activities.
Beyond those statutory minimums, a plan that will actually function requires specificity on a range of operational questions that the statute does not mandate but that courts routinely see litigated after the fact. A plan review starts by confirming the statutory minimums are met and then examines whether the plan is specific enough to operate without conflict.
The Time-Sharing Schedule
The time-sharing schedule is the section that receives the most negotiating attention and the most drafting shortcuts. The shortcuts are the problem.
Regular rotation
The regular rotation — every other weekend, week on week off, 2-2-3, or whatever structure the parties have agreed to — needs to specify: the day and time exchanges occur, the location of exchanges, what happens when an exchange falls on a school holiday or teacher planning day, and what the notice requirement is if a parent cannot make a scheduled exchange.
Plans that say exchanges occur at school address one scenario. They do not address summer, school breaks, or the 25 percent of Fridays that are teacher planning days or early release days. Every scenario that is not specified becomes a negotiation between two people who are already in conflict.
Holiday schedule
The holiday schedule is the most litigated component of Florida parenting plans. The review should confirm:
Every major holiday is addressed. Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year’s Eve, New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, spring break, Memorial Day weekend, Fourth of July, Labor Day weekend, and the children’s birthdays. If the plan does not address a holiday, the regular rotation controls — which means the holiday falls to whoever has the children that day, and the other parent has no recourse.
Which parent has each holiday in year one is specified. Alternate years provisions without a year-one designation produce immediate disputes. The parties will remember the negotiation differently.
Start and end times are specified. Christmas Eve that begins at 6:00 PM and ends at 10:00 AM Christmas Day is enforceable. Christmas Eve without a time is not.
Summer break has its own provisions. Summer break is not just the regular rotation extended. It typically requires separate notice requirements, longer consecutive periods, and provisions for summer programs and travel.
Travel and vacation
The plan should address domestic travel notice requirements, international travel notice requirements and passport provisions, and what happens if one parent wants to take the children outside the country and the other will not consent. Passport provisions are particularly important in South Florida, where international travel and dual citizenship are common.
Decision-Making Authority
Shared parental responsibility is the default in Florida. It means both parents have equal rights to participate in major decisions. The plan review should examine whether the decision-making provisions are specific enough to operate.
What counts as a major decision
Plans that do not define major decisions leave the category open to dispute. Routine medical care is not a major decision. Elective surgery is. Changing schools is a major decision. Choosing between two schools in the same district may or may not be. The plan should identify the categories of decision that require joint consent and the categories that each parent can make independently.
What happens when parents disagree
Shared parental responsibility without a tiebreaker mechanism produces deadlock. The plan should specify a process for resolving disagreements before either party can file a motion. Mediation, a parenting coordinator, or a defined escalation procedure all work. An unspecified requirement to agree does not.
Which parent has responsibility for what
For parents who cannot communicate effectively, provisions giving one parent final decision-making authority on specified categories — medical decisions, school decisions, extracurricular activities — reduce the number of issues that require joint action. These provisions are common in high-conflict cases and are regularly approved by Florida courts.
Communication Protocols
The communication provisions in most Florida parenting plans are not enforceable. Provisions requiring the parties to communicate respectfully, to respond within a reasonable time, or to make decisions together in the best interests of the children set aspirational standards that no court can enforce.
Enforceable communication provisions specify the platform — OurFamilyWizard, TalkingParents, or a similar application that timestamps and preserves all communications — the response time standard, the categories of decisions that must be communicated in writing, and the consequences of using unapproved communication channels.
For high-conflict cases, the communication provisions may be the most important part of the plan. Every dispute that arises from undocumented verbal communication is a dispute that costs money to resolve and produces no clear record.
Relocation
Florida Statute Section 61.13001 governs relocation of more than 50 miles. The plan should address whether the statutory notice requirement is incorporated, what the process is for objecting to a proposed relocation, and what happens to the time-sharing schedule if relocation is approved.
Plans that are silent on relocation leave both parties uncertain about their obligations when the issue arises. In South Florida, where international relocation and moves to other states are common, relocation silence is a significant gap.
Dispute Resolution
Every parenting plan should include a dispute resolution mechanism that the parties must use before filing a motion. Mediation, parenting coordination, or a defined escalation procedure reduces the cost of post-judgment conflict and gives both parties a framework that does not begin with a court filing.
Plans that do not include a dispute resolution mechanism route every disagreement directly to court. In Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach County family courts, that means filing a motion, waiting for a hearing date, and paying attorney fees — for disputes that could have been resolved in a parenting coordination session.
What an Independent Review Delivers
A parenting plan review reads the proposed plan against each of the categories above. It identifies provisions that are too vague to enforce, gaps that will produce conflict, tiebreaker mechanisms that are missing, and holiday schedule provisions that will generate annual disputes.
The written report identifies the specific language by provision, explains what the problem is, and suggests specific alternative language. It is yours to take to your attorney or to use in negotiating changes before the plan is finalized.
The time to fix a parenting plan is before the court enters it. After that, you need a substantial change in circumstances. That threshold was designed for the benefit of children. It applies to everyone equally, including the parent who signed a plan with gaps they did not catch at the time.
The provisions that cause the most conflict after a parenting plan is entered are almost always the ones that seemed too small to negotiate carefully. A review before signing identifies them while you can still do something about it.
Have your parenting plan reviewed before it is ratified.
An independent review identifies vague language, gaps, and missing tiebreakers — while you can still negotiate changes. Flat fee. Miami-Dade, Broward, and Florida statewide.
Prefer to read first? Strategy audit details · Second opinion overview · Contact the firm
The content on this page is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Reading this article does not substitute for consultation with a licensed attorney about your specific situation. Aliette Hernandez Carolan, Esq. is licensed to practice law in Florida only.
Carolan Family Law Firm, PA · Second Opinions · Florida